1:25
|
[06/10/19] Greece: Protesters burn US and NATO flags- English
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the State Department has issued an initial response to a Congressional request for documents as part of an impeachment investigation of President Donald...
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the State Department has issued an initial response to a Congressional request for documents as part of an impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.
Watch Live: http://www.presstv.com/live.html
Twitter: http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak: http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Instagram: http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
#PressTV #Iran #News
More...
Description:
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo says the State Department has issued an initial response to a Congressional request for documents as part of an impeachment investigation of President Donald Trump.
Watch Live: http://www.presstv.com/live.html
Twitter: http://twitter.com/PressTV
LiveLeak: http://www.liveleak.com/c/PressTV
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PRESSTV
Instagram: http://instagram.com/presstvchannel
#PressTV #Iran #News
14:04
|
UNCENSORED WORLD CUP FINAL!! | Animation | Farsi Sub English
What will be the result in the ultimate \"Uncensored World Cup Final!!\"?
What did America do to the West Asian region?
On whose \'team\' is ISIS (DAESH) truly on?
Who...
What will be the result in the ultimate \"Uncensored World Cup Final!!\"?
What did America do to the West Asian region?
On whose \'team\' is ISIS (DAESH) truly on?
Who supported Saddam\'s war against the Islamic Republic?
Who has a direct hand in destroying the Syrian Arab Republic?
Who are the state players in the Resistance Front?
And who are just a few of the state players on the so-called \'Selective Humanitarian Rights\' team?
Who will win the ultimate World Cup Final?
While most of the world looks on at the 2022 World Cup Final in Qatar, there has been an ongoing real \'World Cup\' going on between the forces of Truth and the forces of falsehood.
This short, yet profound and illuminating animation shows us the real \'World Cup\' that has been going on between the forces of Truth and the forces of falsehood.
Watch, enjoy, and most definitely share this real life \"Uncensored World Cup Final!!\"
More...
Description:
What will be the result in the ultimate \"Uncensored World Cup Final!!\"?
What did America do to the West Asian region?
On whose \'team\' is ISIS (DAESH) truly on?
Who supported Saddam\'s war against the Islamic Republic?
Who has a direct hand in destroying the Syrian Arab Republic?
Who are the state players in the Resistance Front?
And who are just a few of the state players on the so-called \'Selective Humanitarian Rights\' team?
Who will win the ultimate World Cup Final?
While most of the world looks on at the 2022 World Cup Final in Qatar, there has been an ongoing real \'World Cup\' going on between the forces of Truth and the forces of falsehood.
This short, yet profound and illuminating animation shows us the real \'World Cup\' that has been going on between the forces of Truth and the forces of falsehood.
Watch, enjoy, and most definitely share this real life \"Uncensored World Cup Final!!\"
Video Tags:
purestream,
media,
production,
UNCENSORED
WORLD
CUP
FINAL,
world
cup,
football,
cup,
unsensored,
animation,
ultimate,
Islamic
Republic,
Arab
Republic,
Syrian
Arab
Republic,
players,
Humanitarian
Rights,
final,
football
worldcup,
iran,
afghanistan,
pakistan,
palestine,
iraq,
siria,
trump,
bush,
salman,
saudi
arabia,
truth,
5:30
|
[218] Hadith Explanation by Imam Khamenei | The Stingy, The Flawed, and The Ignorant | Farsi Sub English
Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei narrates and explains a tradition narrated from the 6th divinely appointed Imam, Imam Ja\\\'far ibn Muhammad al-Sadiq (A), where Imam Sadiq (A) speaks...
Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei narrates and explains a tradition narrated from the 6th divinely appointed Imam, Imam Ja\\\'far ibn Muhammad al-Sadiq (A), where Imam Sadiq (A) speaks about \\\"The Stingy, The Flawed, and The Ignorant\\\".
What kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to make the people wealthy?
And what kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to make the people righteous?
And what kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to give the people forbearance?
What does \\\'Safeeh\\\' mean in the common Arabic parlance?
In what state do the stingy people and the flawed people arise?
And in what state do the ignorant people arise?
What do the stingy people, the people with flaws, and the ignorant people wish for, as regards to other people?
And finally, why is that those things which these aforementioned people desire for other people, are in fact, contrary to their best interest; and what does this mean?
Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei expounds upon the wise words of the 6th divinely appointed Imam, Imam Ja\\\'far al-Sadiq (A), where his eminence (A) speaks about \\\"The Stingy, The Flawed, and The Ignorant\\\".
More...
Description:
Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei narrates and explains a tradition narrated from the 6th divinely appointed Imam, Imam Ja\\\'far ibn Muhammad al-Sadiq (A), where Imam Sadiq (A) speaks about \\\"The Stingy, The Flawed, and The Ignorant\\\".
What kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to make the people wealthy?
And what kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to make the people righteous?
And what kind of people are the most dutybound and appropriate to be doing Dua, requesting the Almighty Allah to give the people forbearance?
What does \\\'Safeeh\\\' mean in the common Arabic parlance?
In what state do the stingy people and the flawed people arise?
And in what state do the ignorant people arise?
What do the stingy people, the people with flaws, and the ignorant people wish for, as regards to other people?
And finally, why is that those things which these aforementioned people desire for other people, are in fact, contrary to their best interest; and what does this mean?
Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei expounds upon the wise words of the 6th divinely appointed Imam, Imam Ja\\\'far al-Sadiq (A), where his eminence (A) speaks about \\\"The Stingy, The Flawed, and The Ignorant\\\".
1:31
|
What Has The UN Done For Palestine? | Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi | Arabic Sub English
What has the United Nations done for the Palestinian people since the fraudulent inception of the Zionist state of israel?
And what has the overall international community done for the...
What has the United Nations done for the Palestinian people since the fraudulent inception of the Zionist state of israel?
And what has the overall international community done for the Palestinians as they faced oppression over the last 70 plus years?
And finally, what did the United Nations do for the Zionist state of israel, when they should have been condemning it?
Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi asks the world, \\\"What Has The UN Done For Palestine?\\\"
More...
Description:
What has the United Nations done for the Palestinian people since the fraudulent inception of the Zionist state of israel?
And what has the overall international community done for the Palestinians as they faced oppression over the last 70 plus years?
And finally, what did the United Nations do for the Zionist state of israel, when they should have been condemning it?
Sayyid Abdul-Malik al-Houthi asks the world, \\\"What Has The UN Done For Palestine?\\\"
Video Tags:
Pure
Stream
Media,
Media,
Abdul
Malik
al
Houthi,
United
Nations,
Zionist
regime,
Al
Aqsa
storm,
Palestine,
humanity,
israel,
international
community,
oppression,
1:27
|
The Illogical Inception of israel | Shaykh Ali Qomi | English
What was UN Resolution 181 and how is it related to the creation of israel?
Upon how much of the historic Palestine was the Zionist state fraudulently created?
And what is one of the reasons...
What was UN Resolution 181 and how is it related to the creation of israel?
Upon how much of the historic Palestine was the Zionist state fraudulently created?
And what is one of the reasons that many individuals don\'t understand the resistance ideology?
And finally, what does all this say about the legitimacy of the United Nations itself?
In this Scholar Clip, Shaykh Ali Qomi talks about the illegitimate birth of the ethnocentric Zionist settler colonial state of israel, as he talks about \"The Illogical Inception of israel\".
#IslamicPulse #ScholarClip #GlobalArrogance #IslamicRevolution #Revolution #Resistance #MassMedia #ArrogantPowers #Truth #Justice #IslamicResistance #Media #FreePalestine #Gaza #HelpGaza #SavePalestine #FreedomFighter #Palestine #AlQuds #UN #AlAqsaStorm #Freedom #Slavery #Zionism #israel #America #DeathToAmerica #DeathToisrael #JihadeTabyiin #SoftWar #IslamicAwareness
More...
Description:
What was UN Resolution 181 and how is it related to the creation of israel?
Upon how much of the historic Palestine was the Zionist state fraudulently created?
And what is one of the reasons that many individuals don\'t understand the resistance ideology?
And finally, what does all this say about the legitimacy of the United Nations itself?
In this Scholar Clip, Shaykh Ali Qomi talks about the illegitimate birth of the ethnocentric Zionist settler colonial state of israel, as he talks about \"The Illogical Inception of israel\".
#IslamicPulse #ScholarClip #GlobalArrogance #IslamicRevolution #Revolution #Resistance #MassMedia #ArrogantPowers #Truth #Justice #IslamicResistance #Media #FreePalestine #Gaza #HelpGaza #SavePalestine #FreedomFighter #Palestine #AlQuds #UN #AlAqsaStorm #Freedom #Slavery #Zionism #israel #America #DeathToAmerica #DeathToisrael #JihadeTabyiin #SoftWar #IslamicAwareness
Video Tags:
Islamicpulse,
Production,
Media,
Illogical
Inception,
israel,
Shaykh
Ali
Qomi,
UN,
history,
Palestine,
Zionist,
resistance
ideology,
United
Nations,
Scholar
Clip,
Freedom,
Gaza,
America,
Seymour Hersh Fatah Al-Islam Crisis in Lebanon - English
Fatah-al-Islam in reality is a creation of the Welch Club This club is named for its godfather David Welch - the current assistant to the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice He is the point man for...
Fatah-al-Islam in reality is a creation of the Welch Club This club is named for its godfather David Welch - the current assistant to the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice He is the point man for the Bush administration and is guided by Eliot Abrams Key Lebanese members of the Welch Club aka the Club include The Lebanese civil war veteran warlord feudalist and mercurial Walid Jumblatt of the Druze party the Progressive Socialist Party or PSP The extremist Phalange party and its Lebanese Forces LF - The group that conducted the Israel organized massacre at Sabra-Shatilla although led by Elie Hobeika once Geageas mentor Geagea did not take part in the Sept 1982 slaughter of 1700 Palestinian and Lebanese The billionaire Saudi Sheikh and Club president Saad Hariri - Leader of the Sunni Future Movement FM Over a year ago Hariris Future Movement started setting up Sunni Islamist terrorist cells the PSP and LF already had their own militia since the civil war and - despite the Taif Accords requiring militia to disarm - they are now rearmed itching for action and trying dilligently to provoke Hezbollah The FM created Sunni Islamist terrorist cells were meant to serve as a cover for anti-Hezbollah Welch Club projects The plan was that actions taken by these cells - of which Fatah el-Islam is one - could be blamed on al Qaeda or Syria
More...
Description:
Fatah-al-Islam in reality is a creation of the Welch Club This club is named for its godfather David Welch - the current assistant to the Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice He is the point man for the Bush administration and is guided by Eliot Abrams Key Lebanese members of the Welch Club aka the Club include The Lebanese civil war veteran warlord feudalist and mercurial Walid Jumblatt of the Druze party the Progressive Socialist Party or PSP The extremist Phalange party and its Lebanese Forces LF - The group that conducted the Israel organized massacre at Sabra-Shatilla although led by Elie Hobeika once Geageas mentor Geagea did not take part in the Sept 1982 slaughter of 1700 Palestinian and Lebanese The billionaire Saudi Sheikh and Club president Saad Hariri - Leader of the Sunni Future Movement FM Over a year ago Hariris Future Movement started setting up Sunni Islamist terrorist cells the PSP and LF already had their own militia since the civil war and - despite the Taif Accords requiring militia to disarm - they are now rearmed itching for action and trying dilligently to provoke Hezbollah The FM created Sunni Islamist terrorist cells were meant to serve as a cover for anti-Hezbollah Welch Club projects The plan was that actions taken by these cells - of which Fatah el-Islam is one - could be blamed on al Qaeda or Syria
7:07
|
Hizbollah Latmiya - Arabic
Swearing a legence to the only true islamic state since the departure of the holy prophet muhammad s.a.w.s after his depature islam went into the ages of darkness of power play and deception not...
Swearing a legence to the only true islamic state since the departure of the holy prophet muhammad s.a.w.s after his depature islam went into the ages of darkness of power play and deception not until our beloved ayatullah khumaiyni came r.a and set a firm foundation for the comming of our awaited saviour imam mahdi a.j.t.f.s
More...
Description:
Swearing a legence to the only true islamic state since the departure of the holy prophet muhammad s.a.w.s after his depature islam went into the ages of darkness of power play and deception not until our beloved ayatullah khumaiyni came r.a and set a firm foundation for the comming of our awaited saviour imam mahdi a.j.t.f.s
Peace Propaganda Promised Land - Part X - English
For an analysis of the situation and available solutions (one state or two?) see GazaAwareness.blogspot.com. Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S....
For an analysis of the situation and available solutions (one state or two?) see GazaAwareness.blogspot.com. Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East by zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
More...
Description:
For an analysis of the situation and available solutions (one state or two?) see GazaAwareness.blogspot.com. Peace Propaganda and the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East by zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The Suez Crisis 1 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Gamal Nasser and Prime Minister Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim world in...
This documentary tells the story of Gamal Nasser and Prime Minister Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim world in this crisis. ---------- FROM WIKIPEDIA SUEZ CRISIS THE PROTOCOL OF SEVRES Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state. - Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. --
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Gamal Nasser and Prime Minister Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim world in this crisis. ---------- FROM WIKIPEDIA SUEZ CRISIS THE PROTOCOL OF SEVRES Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state. - Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. --
The Suez Crisis 2 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 3 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 4 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 5 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 6 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 7 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 9 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
The Suez Crisis 8 of 9 - the other side of Suez - English
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From...
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
More...
Description:
This documentary tells the story of Nasser and Eden wrestling over the control of the Suez Canal. Israel as always plays the role of a STAB IN THE HEART of the Muslim World in this crisis. - From WIKIPEDIA - SUEZ CRISIS - The Protocoal of Sevres - Three months after Egypts nationalization of the canal company a secret meeting took place at Sevres outside Paris. Britain and France enlisted Israeli support for an alliance against Egypt. The parties agreed that Israel would invade the Sinai. Britain and France would then intervene instructing that both the Israeli and Egyptian armies withdraw their forces to a distance of 16 km from either side of the canal. The British and French would then argue that Egypts control of such an important route was too tenuous and that it need be placed under Anglo-French management. - The interests of the parties were various. Britain was anxious lest it lose access to the remains of its empire. France was nervous about the growing influence that Nasser exerted on its North African colonies and protectorates. Both Britain and France were eager that the canal should remain open as an important conduit of oil. Israel wanted to reopen the canal to Israeli shipping and saw the opportunity to strengthen its southern border and to weaken a dangerous and hostile state.- Prior to the operation Britain deliberately neglected to take counsel with the Americans trusting instead that Nassers engagement with communist states would persuade the Americans to accept British and French actions if they were presented as a fait accompli. This proved to be a fatal miscalculation for the colonial powers. ---
Sermon of Lady Fatima - Arabic English
One of the most powerful sermons delivered in the history of Islam in which the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s) stands in his mosque, just days after his passing, to defend her rights. In...
One of the most powerful sermons delivered in the history of Islam in which the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s) stands in his mosque, just days after his passing, to defend her rights. In this most eloquent of sermons, the Lady of Light (a) describes the fundamentals of faith, the philosophy of the Islamic Laws, the appalling state of the people before the advent of Islam and the grave injustices that had been transgressed just days after the Perfector of Justice and the Divine Message left this world
More...
Description:
One of the most powerful sermons delivered in the history of Islam in which the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s) stands in his mosque, just days after his passing, to defend her rights. In this most eloquent of sermons, the Lady of Light (a) describes the fundamentals of faith, the philosophy of the Islamic Laws, the appalling state of the people before the advent of Islam and the grave injustices that had been transgressed just days after the Perfector of Justice and the Divine Message left this world
Robert Fisk on Media Distortion of Hizbollah
Robert Fisk is Britain's most highly decorated foreign correspondent. He has received the British International Journalist of the Year award seven times, most recently in 1995 and 1996. His...
Robert Fisk is Britain's most highly decorated foreign correspondent. He has received the British International Journalist of the Year award seven times, most recently in 1995 and 1996. His specialty is the Middle East, where he has spent the last twenty-three years. Currently the Beirut correspondent for the London Independent, Fisk has covered the Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the Persian Gulf war, and the conflict in Algeria. He is the author of Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War (Atheneum, 1990), and his reporting from Lebanon has brought him international attention. He was the one who broke the story about the Israeli shelling of the U.N. compound in Qana, Lebanon, in 1996.
Fisk visited Madison, Wisconsin, in April to give two lectures on the Israeli-Palestinian crisis. He brought with him film footage of the Qana shelling, as well as footage of an Israeli bombing of a Lebanese ambulance carrying fourteen people. He showed a film he made about Palestinians who had lost their homes when Israel became a state. He also showed interviews with Jews who lost family members in Nazi concentration camps, and he went to Auschwitz to show where the Holocaust took place. In one of his lectures, he made a special point of taking on those who deny the truth of the Holocaust.
Robert Fisk, a world renowned Middle East correspondent for London's Independent, currently resides in Beirut. Mr. Fisk received a Ph.D in Political Science from Trinity College, Dublin in 1985 and an Honorary Doctorate of Literature and Journalism from the University of Lancaster, England. He was The Times Belfast correspondent from 1971 to 1975, and its Middle East correspondent from 1976 to 1987. Fisk has covered the recent conflict in Northern Ireland, Israeli invasions of Lebanon, the Iranian Revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Gulf War, wars in Bosnia and Algeria, NATO war with Yugoslavia, and the Palestinian uprisings. Fisk was the winner of the Amnesty International UK Press Awards in 1998 for his reports from Algeria and in 2000 for his articles on NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. He was awarded the John Hopkins SIAS-CIBA prize for international journalism. Fisk is theauthor of three books: The Point of No Return: The Strike which Broke the British in Ulster (1975), In Time of War: Ireland, Ulster, and the Price of Neutrality (1982, 1983), and Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War (1990, 1992). Most recently Fisk contributed a chapter to Iraq Under Siege: the Deadly Impact of Sanctions and War (2000).
More...
Description:
Robert Fisk is Britain's most highly decorated foreign correspondent. He has received the British International Journalist of the Year award seven times, most recently in 1995 and 1996. His specialty is the Middle East, where he has spent the last twenty-three years. Currently the Beirut correspondent for the London Independent, Fisk has covered the Iranian revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the Persian Gulf war, and the conflict in Algeria. He is the author of Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War (Atheneum, 1990), and his reporting from Lebanon has brought him international attention. He was the one who broke the story about the Israeli shelling of the U.N. compound in Qana, Lebanon, in 1996.
Fisk visited Madison, Wisconsin, in April to give two lectures on the Israeli-Palestinian crisis. He brought with him film footage of the Qana shelling, as well as footage of an Israeli bombing of a Lebanese ambulance carrying fourteen people. He showed a film he made about Palestinians who had lost their homes when Israel became a state. He also showed interviews with Jews who lost family members in Nazi concentration camps, and he went to Auschwitz to show where the Holocaust took place. In one of his lectures, he made a special point of taking on those who deny the truth of the Holocaust.
Robert Fisk, a world renowned Middle East correspondent for London's Independent, currently resides in Beirut. Mr. Fisk received a Ph.D in Political Science from Trinity College, Dublin in 1985 and an Honorary Doctorate of Literature and Journalism from the University of Lancaster, England. He was The Times Belfast correspondent from 1971 to 1975, and its Middle East correspondent from 1976 to 1987. Fisk has covered the recent conflict in Northern Ireland, Israeli invasions of Lebanon, the Iranian Revolution, the Iran-Iraq war, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Gulf War, wars in Bosnia and Algeria, NATO war with Yugoslavia, and the Palestinian uprisings. Fisk was the winner of the Amnesty International UK Press Awards in 1998 for his reports from Algeria and in 2000 for his articles on NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. He was awarded the John Hopkins SIAS-CIBA prize for international journalism. Fisk is theauthor of three books: The Point of No Return: The Strike which Broke the British in Ulster (1975), In Time of War: Ireland, Ulster, and the Price of Neutrality (1982, 1983), and Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War (1990, 1992). Most recently Fisk contributed a chapter to Iraq Under Siege: the Deadly Impact of Sanctions and War (2000).
9:09
|
1:20
|
Cornel West - Imperial vs. Prophetic Christianity - English
The famous public intellectual Cornell West shares his thoughts on the famous movie The Passion. The Passion is about the last days of Jesus. Cornel West makes a distinction between what he calls...
The famous public intellectual Cornell West shares his thoughts on the famous movie The Passion. The Passion is about the last days of Jesus. Cornel West makes a distinction between what he calls the Constantinian Christianity and the Prophetic Christianity. Constantinian Christianity is the state ideology of the empire. It serves the purposes of the empire. On the other hand Prophetic Christianity is the movement against the oppression of the empire. Whatever that empire may be - of the past and the present. Cornel West criticizes the movie - The Passion - for missing this crucial aspect of Jesus mission.
More...
Description:
The famous public intellectual Cornell West shares his thoughts on the famous movie The Passion. The Passion is about the last days of Jesus. Cornel West makes a distinction between what he calls the Constantinian Christianity and the Prophetic Christianity. Constantinian Christianity is the state ideology of the empire. It serves the purposes of the empire. On the other hand Prophetic Christianity is the movement against the oppression of the empire. Whatever that empire may be - of the past and the present. Cornel West criticizes the movie - The Passion - for missing this crucial aspect of Jesus mission.
49:17
|
Two State Solution - Annapolis - Press TV - English
At the heart of the show is the audience driving the debate with own mix of questions. Press TV. Forum. 02 December 2007.
At the heart of the show is the audience driving the debate with own mix of questions. Press TV. Forum. 02 December 2007.
Israel shoah holocust in Gaza - English news
Israel warns Gaza of "shoah". Critics say at least 68 deaths in Gaza in February and 62 in January are a disproportionate response to 3 Israeli deaths in a year. There has been...
Israel warns Gaza of "shoah". Critics say at least 68 deaths in Gaza in February and 62 in January are a disproportionate response to 3 Israeli deaths in a year. There has been international support for Israel's right to defend itself against enemies who deny the Jewish state's right to exist. But there have also been calls for restraint. The word "shoah" is rarely used in Israel beyond discussions of the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews but government spokesmen said Vilnai had employed the word only to mean "disaster"
More...
Description:
Israel warns Gaza of "shoah". Critics say at least 68 deaths in Gaza in February and 62 in January are a disproportionate response to 3 Israeli deaths in a year. There has been international support for Israel's right to defend itself against enemies who deny the Jewish state's right to exist. But there have also been calls for restraint. The word "shoah" is rarely used in Israel beyond discussions of the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews but government spokesmen said Vilnai had employed the word only to mean "disaster"
6:44
|
The Prophet Tells Us Who To Fight - English
Dr. Idris Hamid Associate Professor of Philosophy at Colorado State University Fort Collins and Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Shia Studies discusses the teachings of the Prophet...
Dr. Idris Hamid Associate Professor of Philosophy at Colorado State University Fort Collins and Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Shia Studies discusses the teachings of the Prophet and the 3 types of people the followers of Islam will need to fight. Dr. Hamid also speaks eloquently about the dangers of mistaking the actions of individual Muslims with the religion of Islam itself as well as governments pursing policies that cause individuals to act in extraordinary ways
More...
Description:
Dr. Idris Hamid Associate Professor of Philosophy at Colorado State University Fort Collins and Editor-in-Chief of the International Journal of Shia Studies discusses the teachings of the Prophet and the 3 types of people the followers of Islam will need to fight. Dr. Hamid also speaks eloquently about the dangers of mistaking the actions of individual Muslims with the religion of Islam itself as well as governments pursing policies that cause individuals to act in extraordinary ways
State Terrorism - Short version - English
The truth about what is taking place in Palestine-Israel. Who is the opressor and who is the oppressed
The truth about what is taking place in Palestine-Israel. Who is the opressor and who is the oppressed