Did Obama Lie about FATWA?? - Nuke Free World By Rehbar - English & Persian
DID OBAMA LIE ?????
September 30, 2013 – At his press briefing last Friday, Barack Obama practically ran to the podium to announce his “historic” phone call to Iran and to proclaim that the...
DID OBAMA LIE ?????
September 30, 2013 – At his press briefing last Friday, Barack Obama practically ran to the podium to announce his “historic” phone call to Iran and to proclaim that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a “fatwa” against nuclear arms.
The media salivated at the courageous, bold initiative by the president to negotiate with Iran and to obtain such a stunning diplomatic commitment. It sounded like the foreign policy coup of the century. And to think, all it took was a phone call. Not only that, it happened just days before Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with Obama about the situation in Iran
September 30, 2013 – At his press briefing last Friday, Barack Obama practically ran to the podium to announce his “historic” phone call to Iran and to proclaim that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a “fatwa” against nuclear arms.
The media salivated at the courageous, bold initiative by the president to negotiate with Iran and to obtain such a stunning diplomatic commitment. It sounded like the foreign policy coup of the century. And to think, all it took was a phone call. Not only that, it happened just days before Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with Obama about the situation in Iran
Reading Obama’s Iran speech
President Barack Obama addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, September 24, 2013
President Barack Obama addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:10PM GMT
2
Phyllis Bennis, The Nation
Related Interviews:
‘Rouhani’s remarks in US, conciliatory’
\\\\\\\'Rouhani speech, perfectly appropriate\\\\\\\'
Related Viewpoints:
Ziocons fume over Rouhani UN speech
All of a sudden we’re talking to Iran. Now, granted, that shouldn’t be such an astonishing bombshell. But given the reality of the last several decades, it pretty much is. And that’s all good. It’s been too long coming, it’s still too hesitant, there’s still too much hinting about military force behind it… but we’re talking. Foreign minister to foreign minister, Kerry to Zarif, it’s all a good sign.
There were lots of problem areas in the speech-President Obama was right when he said that US policy in the Middle East would lead to charges of “hypocrisy and inconsistency.” US policy-its protection of Israeli violations of international law, its privileging of petro-monarchies over human rights, its coddling of military dictators-remains rank with hypocrisy and inconsistency. And Obama’s speech reflected much of it.
But President Obama’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly reflected some of the extraordinary shifts in global-especially Middle East and most especially Syria-related-politics that have taken shape in the last six or eight weeks. And on Iran, that was good news. Yes the president trotted out his familiar litany that “we are determined to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.” But this time, there was no “all options on the table” threat. He added explicitly that “we are not seeking regime change and we respect the right of the Iranian people to access peaceful nuclear energy.” The reference to Iran’s right to nuclear energy represented a major shift away from the longstanding claim among many US hawks and the Israeli government that Iran must give up all nuclear enrichment.
Respecting Iran’s right to “access” nuclear energy is still a bit of a dodge, of course-Article IV of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) recognizes not just access but “the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.” Iran is a longstanding signatory to the NPT, and is entitled to all those rights. Obama referred only that “we insist that the Iranian government meet its responsibilities” under the NPT, while saying nothing about Iran’s rights under the treaty. But the high visibility US recognition of any Iranian right to nuclear power-in the context of a new willingness to open talks-is still enormously important.
It was also important that President Obama spoke of Iran with respect, acknowledging Iranian interests and opinions as legitimate and parallel to Washington’s. He recognized that Iranian mistrust of the United States has “deep roots,” referencing (however carefully) the “history of US interference in their affairs and of America’s role in overthrowing an Iranian government during the Cold War.” In fact, his identification of the 1953 US-backed coup that overthrew Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohamed Mossadegh as a product of the Cold War may have been part of an effort to distance himself and his administration from those actions. (It’s a bit disingenuous, of course. The primary rationale for the coup was far more a response to Mossadegh’s nationalization of Iran’s oil than to his ties to the Soviet Union.)
Obama also paid new attention to longstanding Iranian positions. He noted that “the Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons, and President Rouhani has just recently reiterated that the Islamic Republic will never develop a nuclear weapon.” Now anyone following the Iran nuclear issue knows that the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, stated at least as far back as 2003 that nuclear weapons are a violation of Islamic law and Iran would never build or use one, and the fatwa, or legal opinion, was issued at least as far back as 2005. This isn’t new. But for President Obama to mention those judgments in the context of “the basis for a meaningful agreement” is indeed new.
Mainstream US press and officials have long derided those statements, claiming that fatwas are not binding, that 700-year-old religious laws can’t have a position on nuclear weapons, etc. But in so doing they ignore the real significance-that President Rouhani, the Supreme Leader and the rest of Iran’s government have to answer to their own population too. After years of repeating that nuclear weapons would be un-Islamic, would violate a fatwa, etc., it would not be so easy for Iran’s leaders to win popular support for a decision to embrace the bomb.
There is a long way to go in challenging aspects of President Obama’s speech at the United Nations-his embrace of American exceptionalism and his recommitment to a failed approach to Palestinian-Israeli negotiations, his view that war and violence can only be answered by military force or nothing, and more. He didn’t explicitly state a willingness to accept Iran’s participation in international talks on Syria. There is a serious danger that any move towards rapprochement with Iran would be matched with moves to pacify Israeli demands-almost certainly at the expense of Palestinian rights.
But in the broader scenario of US-Iran relations, this is a moment to move forward, to welcome the new approach in Washington now answering the new approach of Tehran.
More flexibility will be required than the United States is usually known for. The usual opponents-in Congress, in Israel and the pro-Israel lobbies-are already on the move, challenging the new opening. But these last weeks showed how a quickly organized demonstration of widespread public opinion, demanding negotiations instead of war, can win. We were able to build a movement fast, agile and powerful enough to reverse an imminent military attack on Syria and instead force a move towards diplomatic solutions to end the war. This time around, the demand to deepen, consolidate and not abandon diplomatic possibilities is on our agenda-and perhaps once again we can
More...
Description:
DID OBAMA LIE ?????
September 30, 2013 – At his press briefing last Friday, Barack Obama practically ran to the podium to announce his “historic” phone call to Iran and to proclaim that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a “fatwa” against nuclear arms.
The media salivated at the courageous, bold initiative by the president to negotiate with Iran and to obtain such a stunning diplomatic commitment. It sounded like the foreign policy coup of the century. And to think, all it took was a phone call. Not only that, it happened just days before Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with Obama about the situation in Iran
September 30, 2013 – At his press briefing last Friday, Barack Obama practically ran to the podium to announce his “historic” phone call to Iran and to proclaim that the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a “fatwa” against nuclear arms.
The media salivated at the courageous, bold initiative by the president to negotiate with Iran and to obtain such a stunning diplomatic commitment. It sounded like the foreign policy coup of the century. And to think, all it took was a phone call. Not only that, it happened just days before Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was scheduled to meet with Obama about the situation in Iran
Reading Obama’s Iran speech
President Barack Obama addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, September 24, 2013
President Barack Obama addresses the 68th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Thu Sep 26, 2013 7:10PM GMT
2
Phyllis Bennis, The Nation
Related Interviews:
‘Rouhani’s remarks in US, conciliatory’
\\\\\\\'Rouhani speech, perfectly appropriate\\\\\\\'
Related Viewpoints:
Ziocons fume over Rouhani UN speech
All of a sudden we’re talking to Iran. Now, granted, that shouldn’t be such an astonishing bombshell. But given the reality of the last several decades, it pretty much is. And that’s all good. It’s been too long coming, it’s still too hesitant, there’s still too much hinting about military force behind it… but we’re talking. Foreign minister to foreign minister, Kerry to Zarif, it’s all a good sign.
There were lots of problem areas in the speech-President Obama was right when he said that US policy in the Middle East would lead to charges of “hypocrisy and inconsistency.” US policy-its protection of Israeli violations of international law, its privileging of petro-monarchies over human rights, its coddling of military dictators-remains rank with hypocrisy and inconsistency. And Obama’s speech reflected much of it.
But President Obama’s speech at the United Nations General Assembly reflected some of the extraordinary shifts in global-especially Middle East and most especially Syria-related-politics that have taken shape in the last six or eight weeks. And on Iran, that was good news. Yes the president trotted out his familiar litany that “we are determined to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.” But this time, there was no “all options on the table” threat. He added explicitly that “we are not seeking regime change and we respect the right of the Iranian people to access peaceful nuclear energy.” The reference to Iran’s right to nuclear energy represented a major shift away from the longstanding claim among many US hawks and the Israeli government that Iran must give up all nuclear enrichment.
Respecting Iran’s right to “access” nuclear energy is still a bit of a dodge, of course-Article IV of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) recognizes not just access but “the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.” Iran is a longstanding signatory to the NPT, and is entitled to all those rights. Obama referred only that “we insist that the Iranian government meet its responsibilities” under the NPT, while saying nothing about Iran’s rights under the treaty. But the high visibility US recognition of any Iranian right to nuclear power-in the context of a new willingness to open talks-is still enormously important.
It was also important that President Obama spoke of Iran with respect, acknowledging Iranian interests and opinions as legitimate and parallel to Washington’s. He recognized that Iranian mistrust of the United States has “deep roots,” referencing (however carefully) the “history of US interference in their affairs and of America’s role in overthrowing an Iranian government during the Cold War.” In fact, his identification of the 1953 US-backed coup that overthrew Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister Mohamed Mossadegh as a product of the Cold War may have been part of an effort to distance himself and his administration from those actions. (It’s a bit disingenuous, of course. The primary rationale for the coup was far more a response to Mossadegh’s nationalization of Iran’s oil than to his ties to the Soviet Union.)
Obama also paid new attention to longstanding Iranian positions. He noted that “the Supreme Leader has issued a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons, and President Rouhani has just recently reiterated that the Islamic Republic will never develop a nuclear weapon.” Now anyone following the Iran nuclear issue knows that the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, stated at least as far back as 2003 that nuclear weapons are a violation of Islamic law and Iran would never build or use one, and the fatwa, or legal opinion, was issued at least as far back as 2005. This isn’t new. But for President Obama to mention those judgments in the context of “the basis for a meaningful agreement” is indeed new.
Mainstream US press and officials have long derided those statements, claiming that fatwas are not binding, that 700-year-old religious laws can’t have a position on nuclear weapons, etc. But in so doing they ignore the real significance-that President Rouhani, the Supreme Leader and the rest of Iran’s government have to answer to their own population too. After years of repeating that nuclear weapons would be un-Islamic, would violate a fatwa, etc., it would not be so easy for Iran’s leaders to win popular support for a decision to embrace the bomb.
There is a long way to go in challenging aspects of President Obama’s speech at the United Nations-his embrace of American exceptionalism and his recommitment to a failed approach to Palestinian-Israeli negotiations, his view that war and violence can only be answered by military force or nothing, and more. He didn’t explicitly state a willingness to accept Iran’s participation in international talks on Syria. There is a serious danger that any move towards rapprochement with Iran would be matched with moves to pacify Israeli demands-almost certainly at the expense of Palestinian rights.
But in the broader scenario of US-Iran relations, this is a moment to move forward, to welcome the new approach in Washington now answering the new approach of Tehran.
More flexibility will be required than the United States is usually known for. The usual opponents-in Congress, in Israel and the pro-Israel lobbies-are already on the move, challenging the new opening. But these last weeks showed how a quickly organized demonstration of widespread public opinion, demanding negotiations instead of war, can win. We were able to build a movement fast, agile and powerful enough to reverse an imminent military attack on Syria and instead force a move towards diplomatic solutions to end the war. This time around, the demand to deepen, consolidate and not abandon diplomatic possibilities is on our agenda-and perhaps once again we can
US Intervention in Iran Part I - English
US overthrew the legally elected government of Iran in 1953 and they don't understand why people over there are mad!! also watch
US overthrew the legally elected government of Iran in 1953 and they don't understand why people over there are mad!! also watch
21:59
|
[03 July 2012] Iran nuclear energy program from 1953 to 2012 - English
[03 July 2012] Iran nuclear energy program from 1953 to 2012 - English
This episode of Press TV's special look at the Iran-P5+1 talks on Iranian nuclear energy program examines the chances of the...
[03 July 2012] Iran nuclear energy program from 1953 to 2012 - English
This episode of Press TV's special look at the Iran-P5+1 talks on Iranian nuclear energy program examines the chances of the standoff being resolved.
More...
Description:
[03 July 2012] Iran nuclear energy program from 1953 to 2012 - English
This episode of Press TV's special look at the Iran-P5+1 talks on Iranian nuclear energy program examines the chances of the standoff being resolved.
21:55
|
3:10
|
25:14
|
Detrás de la Razón - Golpe de Estado contra Irán, 1953 - Spanish
Published on Aug 22, 2015
1953, quizá sea un número con el cual se pueda explicar el porqué del rencor que aún muchos iraníes tienen contra el Occidente, contra EE.UU. sobre todo.
El 19 de...
Published on Aug 22, 2015
1953, quizá sea un número con el cual se pueda explicar el porqué del rencor que aún muchos iraníes tienen contra el Occidente, contra EE.UU. sobre todo.
El 19 de agosto de ese año es una fecha indeleble en la memoria del pueblo de Irán. Es el día en que el primer Gobierno democráticamente electo del país, fue derrocado por un golpe de Estado.
¿Quién organizó y promovió el golpe? Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido. Quitaron a Mohamad Mosadeq, el primer ministro de Irán. Lo consideraban enemigo porque nacionalizó el petróleo y con ello afectó los intereses de las grandes compañías del Occidente.
Además de que el primer ministro estaba ganando una gran popularidad entre el pueblo con ideas que no comulgaban con el sometimiento a los ideales imperialistas. Resultado entonces, derróquenlo fue la orden.
Lo más interesante es que las mismas autoridades estadounidenses reconocieron su delito, claro, años después, y hasta con lujo de cinismo dicen parafraseando: ah, pues por eso, los iraníes nos guardan resentimiento.
La entonces secretaria de Estado estadounidense, Madeleine Albright, reconoció textualmente que EE.UU. lo hizo, le echó la culpa al entonces presidente estadounidense Dwight D. Eisenhower y que por eso muchos no los quieren.
En 2013, la Agencia Central de Inteligencia (CIA, por sus siglas en inglés) reconoce abiertamente el golpe de Estado, conocido como la Operación Ajax, que en contubernio con el Reino Unido se hizo, porque fueron los británicos a quienes se les ocurrió la idea, pero el presidente Harry Truman de EE.UU. se negó a ayudarles hasta que apareció el siguiente, Eisenhower.
60 y tantos años después, la pregunta es, ¿qué tanta confiabilidad un país puede tener hacia otro que le destruyó su democracia y le produjo un golpe de Estado? Más allá de ser enemigos o no, hoy el Gobierno de EE.UU. urge a un acuerdo con Irán.
Desde Irán se observa con inteligencia cada paso, pues regresando al pasado, que tanta esperanza se le puede dar a un Gobierno que ha manoseado tanto y manipulado tanto los asuntos internos no sólo de Irán sino de muchos países.
¡Suscríbete a HispanTV!
https://www.youtube.com/user/hispantv...
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://93.190.24.12/detail.aspx?id=24...
http://www.hispantv.com
http://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
http://plus.google.com/+HispanTV
http://www.hispantv.com/distribuci%C3...
http://www.hispantv.com/directo
http://twitter.com/HispanTV
http://vk.com/HispanTV
More...
Description:
Published on Aug 22, 2015
1953, quizá sea un número con el cual se pueda explicar el porqué del rencor que aún muchos iraníes tienen contra el Occidente, contra EE.UU. sobre todo.
El 19 de agosto de ese año es una fecha indeleble en la memoria del pueblo de Irán. Es el día en que el primer Gobierno democráticamente electo del país, fue derrocado por un golpe de Estado.
¿Quién organizó y promovió el golpe? Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido. Quitaron a Mohamad Mosadeq, el primer ministro de Irán. Lo consideraban enemigo porque nacionalizó el petróleo y con ello afectó los intereses de las grandes compañías del Occidente.
Además de que el primer ministro estaba ganando una gran popularidad entre el pueblo con ideas que no comulgaban con el sometimiento a los ideales imperialistas. Resultado entonces, derróquenlo fue la orden.
Lo más interesante es que las mismas autoridades estadounidenses reconocieron su delito, claro, años después, y hasta con lujo de cinismo dicen parafraseando: ah, pues por eso, los iraníes nos guardan resentimiento.
La entonces secretaria de Estado estadounidense, Madeleine Albright, reconoció textualmente que EE.UU. lo hizo, le echó la culpa al entonces presidente estadounidense Dwight D. Eisenhower y que por eso muchos no los quieren.
En 2013, la Agencia Central de Inteligencia (CIA, por sus siglas en inglés) reconoce abiertamente el golpe de Estado, conocido como la Operación Ajax, que en contubernio con el Reino Unido se hizo, porque fueron los británicos a quienes se les ocurrió la idea, pero el presidente Harry Truman de EE.UU. se negó a ayudarles hasta que apareció el siguiente, Eisenhower.
60 y tantos años después, la pregunta es, ¿qué tanta confiabilidad un país puede tener hacia otro que le destruyó su democracia y le produjo un golpe de Estado? Más allá de ser enemigos o no, hoy el Gobierno de EE.UU. urge a un acuerdo con Irán.
Desde Irán se observa con inteligencia cada paso, pues regresando al pasado, que tanta esperanza se le puede dar a un Gobierno que ha manoseado tanto y manipulado tanto los asuntos internos no sólo de Irán sino de muchos países.
¡Suscríbete a HispanTV!
https://www.youtube.com/user/hispantv...
El grupo de HispanTV les recuerda a los seguidores de nuestra página en Youtube de que en el caso de que no se suban nuevos vídeos, en 48 horas, esto significa que han bloqueado el acceso de este canal a su cuenta en YouTube. De ser así, haga Clic en el siguiente enlace para obtener nuestra nueva dirección en YouTube:
http://93.190.24.12/detail.aspx?id=24...
http://www.hispantv.com
http://www.facebook.com/HispanTV
http://plus.google.com/+HispanTV
http://www.hispantv.com/distribuci%C3...
http://www.hispantv.com/directo
http://twitter.com/HispanTV
http://vk.com/HispanTV
26:03
|
[Must Watch] Aperture - American Coup - Part 1 - English
After the hugely popular PM Mosaddegh successfully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, UK and US intelligence services overthrew his democratically elected government during the 1953 coup...
After the hugely popular PM Mosaddegh successfully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, UK and US intelligence services overthrew his democratically elected government during the 1953 coup d’état.
Aperture-American CoupAMERICAN COUP
IN AUGUST OF 1953 IRAN HAD A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT. ITS PARLIAMENT AND PRIME MINISTER, THE POPULAR MOHAMMAD MOSSADEGH, HAD NATIONALISED THE OIL INDUSTRY TO CONTROL THE COUNTRY’S CHIEF ASSET. THEN THE CIA INTERVENED.
I am honoured to be in the timeless city of Cairo. (cheering) We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world. Tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. For many years Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country and there
is, in fact, a tumultuous history between us. Since the Islamic revolution Iran has played in role in acts of hostage taking and violence against US troops and civilians. In the middle of the Cold War the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. This history is well
known.
More...
Description:
After the hugely popular PM Mosaddegh successfully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, UK and US intelligence services overthrew his democratically elected government during the 1953 coup d’état.
Aperture-American CoupAMERICAN COUP
IN AUGUST OF 1953 IRAN HAD A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT. ITS PARLIAMENT AND PRIME MINISTER, THE POPULAR MOHAMMAD MOSSADEGH, HAD NATIONALISED THE OIL INDUSTRY TO CONTROL THE COUNTRY’S CHIEF ASSET. THEN THE CIA INTERVENED.
I am honoured to be in the timeless city of Cairo. (cheering) We meet at a time of great tension between the United States and Muslims around the world. Tension rooted in historical forces that go beyond any current policy debate. For many years Iran has defined itself in part by its opposition to my country and there
is, in fact, a tumultuous history between us. Since the Islamic revolution Iran has played in role in acts of hostage taking and violence against US troops and civilians. In the middle of the Cold War the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. This history is well
known.
3:22
|
Chalmers Johnson speaking freely about CIA - English
An interesting documentary in which Professor Chalmers Johnson speaks about CIA being the private army of the president CIA disastrous intervention Iran government of 1953. The CIA could not even...
An interesting documentary in which Professor Chalmers Johnson speaks about CIA being the private army of the president CIA disastrous intervention Iran government of 1953. The CIA could not even detect when the Soviet Union Economy was coming apart
More...
Description:
An interesting documentary in which Professor Chalmers Johnson speaks about CIA being the private army of the president CIA disastrous intervention Iran government of 1953. The CIA could not even detect when the Soviet Union Economy was coming apart
7:43
|
25:45
|
CIA: Biggest terrorist organization of the World - English
A close look at the history of the CIA from its initial mission of intelligence gathering during World War II to covert subversive, counterrevolutionary, assassination operations around the world...
A close look at the history of the CIA from its initial mission of intelligence gathering during World War II to covert subversive, counterrevolutionary, assassination operations around the world to CIA-led coups and regime changes from its backyard of Latin America to Africa, Europe, Middle East/Near East, Far East, Central Asia, ... to its present day War on Terror. Also a look at CIA-run torture chambers around the world including Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and countless unknown brigs on the deck of US ships around the world.
Operations such as operation Condor of 1975 when at least 60,000 revolutionaries were assassinated in Southern America and Operation Ajax, the 1953 coup against Iran\'s Musaddegh. A close look at CIA\'s role in creating and fostering terror and terrorists around the world from Latin American assassins to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
More...
Description:
A close look at the history of the CIA from its initial mission of intelligence gathering during World War II to covert subversive, counterrevolutionary, assassination operations around the world to CIA-led coups and regime changes from its backyard of Latin America to Africa, Europe, Middle East/Near East, Far East, Central Asia, ... to its present day War on Terror. Also a look at CIA-run torture chambers around the world including Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and countless unknown brigs on the deck of US ships around the world.
Operations such as operation Condor of 1975 when at least 60,000 revolutionaries were assassinated in Southern America and Operation Ajax, the 1953 coup against Iran\'s Musaddegh. A close look at CIA\'s role in creating and fostering terror and terrorists around the world from Latin American assassins to the Taliban in Afghanistan.
24:33
|
[Must Watch] Aperture - American Coup - Part 2 – English
After the hugely popular PM Mosaddegh successfully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, UK and US intelligence services overthrew his democratically elected government during the 1953 coup d’état.
After the hugely popular PM Mosaddegh successfully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, UK and US intelligence services overthrew his democratically elected government during the 1953 coup d’état.
25:23
|
[05] Azadari-e-Fatamiyya Dar Jamia Orwatul Wuthqa - Ustad Syed Jawad Naqavi - Urdu
Subject : Falsafa e Deen
Event : Ayyam-e-Fatimiyya
Category : Majalis
Location : Lahore
Description : Daily Azadari held duriing the Fatamiyya Majalis in Jamia Orwatul Wurhqa from 1st to 5th...
Subject : Falsafa e Deen
Event : Ayyam-e-Fatimiyya
Category : Majalis
Location : Lahore
Description : Daily Azadari held duriing the Fatamiyya Majalis in Jamia Orwatul Wurhqa from 1st to 5th Jamadi-us-Sani 1435 AH. Day 05 - Azadari
More...
Description:
Subject : Falsafa e Deen
Event : Ayyam-e-Fatimiyya
Category : Majalis
Location : Lahore
Description : Daily Azadari held duriing the Fatamiyya Majalis in Jamia Orwatul Wurhqa from 1st to 5th Jamadi-us-Sani 1435 AH. Day 05 - Azadari
0:38
|
7:42
|
Inner Revolutions | Is He One of Y\\\'all? - English
Abu Bakr Saddique was raised by a woman known around the city of Buffalo, NY as a champion of human rights and a helper of the poor. In his neighborhood of mostly Italian-American immigrants,...
Abu Bakr Saddique was raised by a woman known around the city of Buffalo, NY as a champion of human rights and a helper of the poor. In his neighborhood of mostly Italian-American immigrants, Saddique says there was one incident that stood out for him in particular.
“I was out front playing. We were in the projects – only black family on the street. And I saw this lady. She was a white lady. She was walking down the street and she was going from apartment to apartment – and we lived in a row house. People were slamming the door in her face. She got to our house, and my mother opened up the door and invited her in. So I’m out playing, everything is tight. We’re on welfare. I go into the house and there was this woman sitting down there – eating. I said, ‘woah, what is this? Man, she’s eating up our food.’ You know? And my mother, it was like she didn’t care. She said, ‘she needed to eat’. She gave her food and she gave her some money. Yes. That’s how she was. And she said, ‘always be kind to strangers’”.
Saddique was six and the year was 1953. He says his mother’s character and behavior in situations like this prepared the ground for his eventual conversion to Islam. Saddique first learned about the religion in fourth grade.
“There was Niagara Street Library. I got a book on the Crusades about Richard the Lionheart. That peaked my interest in Islam because they couldn’t say anything about Salahuddin Ayyubi not being good. I saw Muslims in the 50s – some NOI (Nation of Islam), some orthodox. Malcolm X also used to come to Buffalo a lot in the 50s and 60s”.
It wasn’t until 1973, when Saddique was training at an Army base in Texas, that his interest in Islam began to take shape.
visit: innerrevolutions.net
More...
Description:
Abu Bakr Saddique was raised by a woman known around the city of Buffalo, NY as a champion of human rights and a helper of the poor. In his neighborhood of mostly Italian-American immigrants, Saddique says there was one incident that stood out for him in particular.
“I was out front playing. We were in the projects – only black family on the street. And I saw this lady. She was a white lady. She was walking down the street and she was going from apartment to apartment – and we lived in a row house. People were slamming the door in her face. She got to our house, and my mother opened up the door and invited her in. So I’m out playing, everything is tight. We’re on welfare. I go into the house and there was this woman sitting down there – eating. I said, ‘woah, what is this? Man, she’s eating up our food.’ You know? And my mother, it was like she didn’t care. She said, ‘she needed to eat’. She gave her food and she gave her some money. Yes. That’s how she was. And she said, ‘always be kind to strangers’”.
Saddique was six and the year was 1953. He says his mother’s character and behavior in situations like this prepared the ground for his eventual conversion to Islam. Saddique first learned about the religion in fourth grade.
“There was Niagara Street Library. I got a book on the Crusades about Richard the Lionheart. That peaked my interest in Islam because they couldn’t say anything about Salahuddin Ayyubi not being good. I saw Muslims in the 50s – some NOI (Nation of Islam), some orthodox. Malcolm X also used to come to Buffalo a lot in the 50s and 60s”.
It wasn’t until 1973, when Saddique was training at an Army base in Texas, that his interest in Islam began to take shape.
visit: innerrevolutions.net
5:34
|
Inner Revolutions | A Supreme Impact - English
Demonstrations against the Shah of Iran were in full swing in the United States and Europe as early as 1977 and continued until the success of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in January of 1979....
Demonstrations against the Shah of Iran were in full swing in the United States and Europe as early as 1977 and continued until the success of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in January of 1979. This victory led to the fall of the Pahlavi regime. Consequently, many regime supporters including members of SAVAK, the dictator’s personal secret police force, began to hold demonstrations demanding the United States overthrow the elected government and reinstall the Shah – or his son – as monarch. The hope was that the United States would orchestrate a coup similar to the one they had helped manufacture in 1953 against Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. At the same time, pro-revolution demonstrations continued, often in conflict with the pro-Shah supporters. One demonstration turned particularly chaotic in the summer of 1980. Safiyyah Abdullah was there and gives her account of the events that led up to a spontaneous act of solidarity by a group of indigenous American activists.
innerrevolutions.net
More...
Description:
Demonstrations against the Shah of Iran were in full swing in the United States and Europe as early as 1977 and continued until the success of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in January of 1979. This victory led to the fall of the Pahlavi regime. Consequently, many regime supporters including members of SAVAK, the dictator’s personal secret police force, began to hold demonstrations demanding the United States overthrow the elected government and reinstall the Shah – or his son – as monarch. The hope was that the United States would orchestrate a coup similar to the one they had helped manufacture in 1953 against Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. At the same time, pro-revolution demonstrations continued, often in conflict with the pro-Shah supporters. One demonstration turned particularly chaotic in the summer of 1980. Safiyyah Abdullah was there and gives her account of the events that led up to a spontaneous act of solidarity by a group of indigenous American activists.
innerrevolutions.net
33:03
|
7:39
|
دوسرا انقلاب | دستاویزی فلم (قسط 1/3) | Urdu
ایران کے مرکز تہران میں امریکی سفارت خانے یعنی جاسوسی کے اڈے پر ایرانی جوانون کے قبضے کی داستان اس 3 قسطوں پر...
ایران کے مرکز تہران میں امریکی سفارت خانے یعنی جاسوسی کے اڈے پر ایرانی جوانون کے قبضے کی داستان اس 3 قسطوں پر مشتمل دستاویزی فلم میں ضرور ملاحظہ فرمائیں۔
پہلی قسط: امریکہ کی ایران کے ساتھ دشمنی کے آغاز کے بارے میں تحریف
ایران کے ساتھ امریکہ کی دشمنی کی شروعات ایران میں انقلاب اسلامی کی کامیابی یا پھر طلباء کی جانب سے تہران میں واقع امریکی جاسوسی اڈے پر قبضے کے بعد سے نہیں ہوتی بلکہ اس کی تاریخ بہت پرانی ہے، چنانچہ اسی تناظر میں دیکھا جائے تو انقلاب اسلامی سے پہلے بھی جمہوری طریقے سے منتخب ہونے والی منتخب حکومتوں کو سرنگون کرنے میں امریکہ نے کردار ادا کیا ہے جسکی ایک مثال ڈاکٹر مصدق کی حکومت کے خلاف، فوجی بغاوت ہے جس کی جانب امریکی صدر باراک اوباما نے اپنے مصر کے دورے کے دوران اپنی تقریر میں اشارہ بھی کیا بنابر این، ایران کے ساتھ امریکہ کی دشمنی کی تاریخ کافی پرانی ہے اور امریکیوں نے ایرانی عوام کے خلاف ہر موقع پر اپنی دشمنی کا ثبوت دیتے ہوئے ایرانی عوام کے خلاف مختلف کئی طریقے اپناتے ہوئے انہیں کچلنے کی کوشش کی ہے اور اسلامی انقلاب کے بعد تو ایرانی عوام کے خلاف امریکی دشمنی میں مزید شدت آگئی اور اسلامی جمہوریہ ایران کے خلاف امریکہ نے اپنی دشمنی کا کھل کر اعلان کیا۔
تاریخ کے مختلف ادوار میں امریکہ نے ایران کے خلاف اپنی دشمنی کا ثبوت دیتے ہوئے کس طرح کے حربے استعمال کئے؟ اور انقلاب اسلامی سے پہلے امریکیوں نے 1953 میں بغاوت کے ذریعے کونسی قانونی حکومت کو گرانے میں کردار ادا کیا؟ امریکہ کی جانب سے ایران کے اندرونی امور میں ہر قسم کی مداخلت اور ایرانی عوام کے ساتھ دشمنی کے نتیجے میں ایرانی عوام کی جانب سے کس طرح کا رد عمل سامنے آگیا؟ بانی انقلاب اسلامی حضرت امام خمینیؒ کی تقریروں میں سب سے زیادہ دہرائے جانے والے موضوعات میں کونسا موضوع سر فہرست ہے؟
امریکہ کی ایران دشمنی سے متعلق مذکورہ تمام سوالات سمیت اور بھی بہت سے سوالات کے جوابات سے آگاہی کیلئے اس ویڈیو کو ضرور دیکھیں۔
#امریکہ #دشمنی #انقلاب #ایران #تہران #جاسوسی #تاریخ #جمہوری #سرنگون #مصدق #بغاوت #تاریخ #شدت #حربے #حکومت #قانونی #مداخلت
More...
Description:
ایران کے مرکز تہران میں امریکی سفارت خانے یعنی جاسوسی کے اڈے پر ایرانی جوانون کے قبضے کی داستان اس 3 قسطوں پر مشتمل دستاویزی فلم میں ضرور ملاحظہ فرمائیں۔
پہلی قسط: امریکہ کی ایران کے ساتھ دشمنی کے آغاز کے بارے میں تحریف
ایران کے ساتھ امریکہ کی دشمنی کی شروعات ایران میں انقلاب اسلامی کی کامیابی یا پھر طلباء کی جانب سے تہران میں واقع امریکی جاسوسی اڈے پر قبضے کے بعد سے نہیں ہوتی بلکہ اس کی تاریخ بہت پرانی ہے، چنانچہ اسی تناظر میں دیکھا جائے تو انقلاب اسلامی سے پہلے بھی جمہوری طریقے سے منتخب ہونے والی منتخب حکومتوں کو سرنگون کرنے میں امریکہ نے کردار ادا کیا ہے جسکی ایک مثال ڈاکٹر مصدق کی حکومت کے خلاف، فوجی بغاوت ہے جس کی جانب امریکی صدر باراک اوباما نے اپنے مصر کے دورے کے دوران اپنی تقریر میں اشارہ بھی کیا بنابر این، ایران کے ساتھ امریکہ کی دشمنی کی تاریخ کافی پرانی ہے اور امریکیوں نے ایرانی عوام کے خلاف ہر موقع پر اپنی دشمنی کا ثبوت دیتے ہوئے ایرانی عوام کے خلاف مختلف کئی طریقے اپناتے ہوئے انہیں کچلنے کی کوشش کی ہے اور اسلامی انقلاب کے بعد تو ایرانی عوام کے خلاف امریکی دشمنی میں مزید شدت آگئی اور اسلامی جمہوریہ ایران کے خلاف امریکہ نے اپنی دشمنی کا کھل کر اعلان کیا۔
تاریخ کے مختلف ادوار میں امریکہ نے ایران کے خلاف اپنی دشمنی کا ثبوت دیتے ہوئے کس طرح کے حربے استعمال کئے؟ اور انقلاب اسلامی سے پہلے امریکیوں نے 1953 میں بغاوت کے ذریعے کونسی قانونی حکومت کو گرانے میں کردار ادا کیا؟ امریکہ کی جانب سے ایران کے اندرونی امور میں ہر قسم کی مداخلت اور ایرانی عوام کے ساتھ دشمنی کے نتیجے میں ایرانی عوام کی جانب سے کس طرح کا رد عمل سامنے آگیا؟ بانی انقلاب اسلامی حضرت امام خمینیؒ کی تقریروں میں سب سے زیادہ دہرائے جانے والے موضوعات میں کونسا موضوع سر فہرست ہے؟
امریکہ کی ایران دشمنی سے متعلق مذکورہ تمام سوالات سمیت اور بھی بہت سے سوالات کے جوابات سے آگاہی کیلئے اس ویڈیو کو ضرور دیکھیں۔
#امریکہ #دشمنی #انقلاب #ایران #تہران #جاسوسی #تاریخ #جمہوری #سرنگون #مصدق #بغاوت #تاریخ #شدت #حربے #حکومت #قانونی #مداخلت
Video Tags:
Wilayat,
Media,
WilayatMedia,
iran,
tehran,
America,
enqelab,
enqelab
islami,
hukumat,
Dr.
Mossadegh,
tarikh,
Barack
Obama,
islami
jumhuri,
Islam,
Imam
khomeini,
37:45
|
Why Would America Support Iranian Rioters? | IP Talk Show | English
Why would the Western Powers and specifically, America, support the terrorists and violent rioters in Iran?
What was the 1953 coup d\'état all about and who all was involved in this coup...
Why would the Western Powers and specifically, America, support the terrorists and violent rioters in Iran?
What was the 1953 coup d\'état all about and who all was involved in this coup d\'état?
Did the animosity of the West increase or decrease after the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran?
How did the recent rioters after Ms. Mahsa Amini\'s death, play in the plans of the Western Powers that supported them?
Are the Western Powers merely in opposition to a strong Islamic Republic, or are they also against a \'Strong Iran\'?
What is the major hurdle for the hegemonic powers of the world in implementing their schemes in the West Asian region?
And is the instigation and inciting of violent riots by the hegemonic powers limited to just the Islamic Republic of Iran, or can it be seen in other parts of the world as well?
What is the overall approach of the hegemonic powers, vis-à-vis the nations that they want to have control over?
And have these Western Powers that supported the violent rioters in the Islamic Republic, ever supported violent rioters in other Western countries such as the rioters in France?
And do these Western Powers ever give violent rioters in countries other than the Islamic Republic, the mass media coverage that was given to the violent rioters in Iran?
And does it make sense for the mass media to totally ignore all the other massive problems of the world and merely focus on the riots in the Islamic Republic of Iran?
What is it about the Islamic Republic of Iran that has attracted the enmity of the Western hegemonic powers of the world, where they would stoop to the low of supporting violent rioters?
What is the \'I can pat you on the back or punch you in the face\' policy of the Western hegemonic powers of the world?
And what is the \'we were able to do it, so can you\' policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
What is the correct term \'Middle East\' or \'West Asia\', and why is one correct and the other incorrect?
And finally, what is the truth as far as \"Why Would America Support Iranian Rioters?\"
To answers these questions and more, we humbly invited Shaykh Ali Qomi from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, to sit down with us and explain for us, \"Why Would America Support Iranian Rioters?\"
#IslamicPulse #IPTalkShow #Islam #Allah #Quran #AhlulBayt #Media #Propanda #MahsaAmini #Mahsa #Iran #Wilayah #Imamate #Truth #Justice #Rghteousness #Freedom #Independence #Revolution #IslamicRevolution #IslamicAwakening #Imam Khomeini #Khomeini #ImamKhamenei #Khamenei #Honor #Falsehood #Evil #Taghut
More...
Description:
Why would the Western Powers and specifically, America, support the terrorists and violent rioters in Iran?
What was the 1953 coup d\'état all about and who all was involved in this coup d\'état?
Did the animosity of the West increase or decrease after the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran?
How did the recent rioters after Ms. Mahsa Amini\'s death, play in the plans of the Western Powers that supported them?
Are the Western Powers merely in opposition to a strong Islamic Republic, or are they also against a \'Strong Iran\'?
What is the major hurdle for the hegemonic powers of the world in implementing their schemes in the West Asian region?
And is the instigation and inciting of violent riots by the hegemonic powers limited to just the Islamic Republic of Iran, or can it be seen in other parts of the world as well?
What is the overall approach of the hegemonic powers, vis-à-vis the nations that they want to have control over?
And have these Western Powers that supported the violent rioters in the Islamic Republic, ever supported violent rioters in other Western countries such as the rioters in France?
And do these Western Powers ever give violent rioters in countries other than the Islamic Republic, the mass media coverage that was given to the violent rioters in Iran?
And does it make sense for the mass media to totally ignore all the other massive problems of the world and merely focus on the riots in the Islamic Republic of Iran?
What is it about the Islamic Republic of Iran that has attracted the enmity of the Western hegemonic powers of the world, where they would stoop to the low of supporting violent rioters?
What is the \'I can pat you on the back or punch you in the face\' policy of the Western hegemonic powers of the world?
And what is the \'we were able to do it, so can you\' policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
What is the correct term \'Middle East\' or \'West Asia\', and why is one correct and the other incorrect?
And finally, what is the truth as far as \"Why Would America Support Iranian Rioters?\"
To answers these questions and more, we humbly invited Shaykh Ali Qomi from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, to sit down with us and explain for us, \"Why Would America Support Iranian Rioters?\"
#IslamicPulse #IPTalkShow #Islam #Allah #Quran #AhlulBayt #Media #Propanda #MahsaAmini #Mahsa #Iran #Wilayah #Imamate #Truth #Justice #Rghteousness #Freedom #Independence #Revolution #IslamicRevolution #IslamicAwakening #Imam Khomeini #Khomeini #ImamKhamenei #Khamenei #Honor #Falsehood #Evil #Taghut
Video Tags:
islamicpulse,
media,
production,
Talk
Show,
Islam,
Allah,
Quran,
ahlul
bayt,
propanda,
mahsa
amini,
Iran,
wilayah,
imamate,
truth,
justice,
freedom,
Evil,
2:22
|
امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے دشمنی کی شروعات | رہبر معظم | Farsi Sub Urdu
عام طور پر امریکی سیاستدان، امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے عداوت کی وجہ، سفارت پر حملے کو قرار دیتے ہوئے کہتے ہیں...
عام طور پر امریکی سیاستدان، امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے عداوت کی وجہ، سفارت پر حملے کو قرار دیتے ہوئے کہتے ہیں کہ امریکہ کی ایران سے دشمنی کا آغاز تہران میں واقع امریکی سفارت خانے پر حملے سے ہوا جبکہ یہ دکھاوے اورسراسر جھوٹ کے سوا کچھ بھی نہیں ہے، کیونکہ امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے دشمنی کی شروعات، 19 اگست 1953 میں رونما ہونے والے واقعے سے ہوئی جس میں امریکیوں نے ڈاکٹر مصدق کی سربراہی میں قومی حکومت کے خلاف بغاوت کرتے ہوئے ڈاکٹر مصدق کو اقتدار سے ہٹاکر انہیں انکے ساتھیوں سمیت گرفتار کیا گیا۔ چنانچہ اس بغاوت کے پس پردہ عوامل کیا تھے؟ اس سلسلے میں آگاہی کے لئے ولی امر مسلمین امام سید علی خامنہ ای کی اس ویڈیو کو ضرور دیکھئے۔
#ویڈیو #ولی_امر_مسلمین #ڈاکٹر_مصدق #امریکہ #دشمنی #ایرانی_عوام #تیل #برطانیہ #امریکی_ایلچی #بغاوت #غداری #شروعات
More...
Description:
عام طور پر امریکی سیاستدان، امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے عداوت کی وجہ، سفارت پر حملے کو قرار دیتے ہوئے کہتے ہیں کہ امریکہ کی ایران سے دشمنی کا آغاز تہران میں واقع امریکی سفارت خانے پر حملے سے ہوا جبکہ یہ دکھاوے اورسراسر جھوٹ کے سوا کچھ بھی نہیں ہے، کیونکہ امریکہ کی ایرانی عوام سے دشمنی کی شروعات، 19 اگست 1953 میں رونما ہونے والے واقعے سے ہوئی جس میں امریکیوں نے ڈاکٹر مصدق کی سربراہی میں قومی حکومت کے خلاف بغاوت کرتے ہوئے ڈاکٹر مصدق کو اقتدار سے ہٹاکر انہیں انکے ساتھیوں سمیت گرفتار کیا گیا۔ چنانچہ اس بغاوت کے پس پردہ عوامل کیا تھے؟ اس سلسلے میں آگاہی کے لئے ولی امر مسلمین امام سید علی خامنہ ای کی اس ویڈیو کو ضرور دیکھئے۔
#ویڈیو #ولی_امر_مسلمین #ڈاکٹر_مصدق #امریکہ #دشمنی #ایرانی_عوام #تیل #برطانیہ #امریکی_ایلچی #بغاوت #غداری #شروعات
Video Tags:
Wilayat,
Media,
WilayatMedia,
America,
Iran,
Eawam,
Dushman,
Rahbar,
Imam
Khamenei,
Sefarat,
Tehran,
Doctor
Mossadegh,
Mossadeq,
Britannia,
امریکہ,
ایرانی
عوام,
دشمنی,
رہبر
معظم,
امام
خامنہ
ای,